Toulmin Method in an online world

The model of argument dissection Toulmin developed is fairly straightforward yet powerful as it allows for a simple, repeatable process to break an argument down.  The simple approach is beneficial to sorting through the argument noise encountered every day, both professional and personally.  The ability to argue seems as popular as ever with online platforms facilitating the ability to argue in a much easier fashion, for better or worse.  The caveat to this is it often isn’t about argument, or critical thinking, rather, who can ‘scream’ the loudest – I could also make this case this situation arises professionally as well.  All that aside, identifying the three main elements of an argument (claim, reason, and evidence) as well as the warrant can greatly assist in sorting through the noise that often accompanies an argument.

The advent of instantaneous information, valid or not, I believe has helped argumentation.  The challenge, however, is executing a level headed argument in an environment where typical social etiquette does not exist.  The prevalence of incorrect information spread across online content is another facet of this challenge – an argument based on fallacy is a waste of time but can the arguer be convinced of their error?  THUNK examines some of this with a look into a Reddit’s “Change My View” forum, one that is dedicated to rational, persuasive arguments.  Successful counter arguments were flagged and analyzed to understand what made them successful – it is an interesting concept to further the art of arguing online, a medium in which lacks the tact for refinement.

While Toulmin’s method provides a sound approach to argument examination, the wildcard in the act of arguments is human emotion.  A topic that invokes passion is likely to trigger an emotional reaction and therefor, critical thinking is abandoned.  Most likely not entirely deliberate, it is a human reaction – truly polished arguers maintain their composure and provide the necessary detail for a counter argument or rebuttal.  However, for the bulk of the population (myself included) that is a large hurdle to overcome when arguing a topic that one has a great deal of thought or care invested.  Communication is essential for us all personally and especially professionally and the ability to argue effectively is a critical component of our communication tool box, of which, Toulmin’s method is a key utility.